Top Critic Average
Critics Recommend
Battlefield Presentation
Bugs and Polish
Campaign Miss
For multiplayer fans of this series, there's a lot to love about Battlefield V. It brings the classic Battlefield presentation and gameplay to a World War 2 setting, with some nice changes to make things feel fresh. However, the campaign is still lacking, and the launch bugs still present.
Battlefield V combines exciting multiplayer action with jaw-dropping visuals and superb audio design, but it's hurt by bugs and a lackluster single player campaign.
A strong if slim shooter that lays down strong foundations for the future, while feeling a little unfinished.
Battlefield V is a grand and addictive shooter with some smart ideas for improving gunplay and team dynamics, but at launch it has too many technical issues and holes in its content to excel.
Despite changes such as fortifications, more physical character movement, and an increased focus on squads, it still scratches that distinctive FPS itch that Battlefield always has.
Not as drastic a change up as its WW1 predecessor, nor as wild or wondrous, Battlefield 5's deliberative design sidelines its strengths as a simulative sandbox.
Battlefield V is a good, if safe game that feels more iterative than innovative. Its legacy will likely be defined by how steady and interesting the stream of new content is moving forward
It's a fine execution of a familiar formula. There are rough spots, but Battlefield V incorporates small, effective tweaks and truly shines in the more focused objective-based modes.
Battlefield V is one of the best current multiplayer shooters on the market.
Battlefield fans will want to keep a close eye on this summer's big showcases.
Read more
The titles that will be available to try during this week's Free Play Days event have been revealed
Read more
A number of games have been announced for Xbox Game Pass
Read more
E3 is starting early with the big reveal of the next Battlefield game coming on June 9. Here are all the details in advance of its proper debut.
Read more
